Quotes By Richard Stallman

The computer industry is the only industry that is more fashion-driven than women's fashion.

When I launched the development of the GNU system, I explicitly said the purpose of developing this system is so we can use our computers and have freedom, thus if you use some other free system instead but you have freedom, then it's a success. It's not popularity for our code but it's success for our goal.

CD stores have the disadvantage of an expensive inventory, but digital bookshops would need no such thing: they could write copies at the time of sale on to memory sticks, and sell you one if you forgot your own.

In the free/libre software movement, we develop software that respects users' freedom, so we and you can escape from software that doesn't.

The reason that a good citizen does not use such destructive means to become wealthier is that, if everyone did so, we would all become poorer from the mutual destructiveness.

Android is very different from the GNU/Linux operating system because it contains very little of GNU. Indeed, just about the only component in common between Android and GNU/Linux is Linux, the kernel.

All governments should be pressured to correct their abuses of human rights.

Also, because schools must teach the spirit of goodwill, the habit of helping others around you, every class should have this rule: students, if you bring software to class you may not keep it for yourself.

Facebook collects a lot of data from people and admits it. And it also collects data which isn't admitted. And Google does too. As for Microsoft, I don't know. But I do know that Windows has features that send data about the user.

I suppose many people will continue moving towards careless computing, because there's a sucker born every minute.

Free software is software that respects your freedom and the social solidarity of your community. So it's free as in freedom.

Control over the use of one's ideas really constitutes control over other people's lives; and it is usually used to make their lives more difficult.

The interesting thing about cloud computing is that we've redefined cloud computing to include everything that we already do.

Sharing is good, and with digital technology, sharing is easy.

I could have made money this way, and perhaps amused myself writing code. But I knew that at the end of my career, I would look back on years of building walls to divide people, and feel I had spent my life making the world a worse place.

One reason you should not use web applications to do your computing is that you lose control.

In practice, the copyright system does a bad job of supporting authors, aside from the most popular ones. Other authors' principal interest is to be better known, so sharing their work benefits them as well as readers.

Software patents are dangerous to software developers because they impose monopolies on software ideas.

In the US, you even lose legal rights if you store your data in a company's machines instead of your own. The police need to present you with a search warrant to get your data from you; but if they are stored in a company's server, the police can get it without showing you anything.

If you want to accomplish something in the world, idealism is not enough - you need to choose a method that works to achieve the goal.

With paper printed books, you have certain freedoms. You can acquire the book anonymously by paying cash, which is the way I always buy books. I never use a credit card. I don't identify to any database when I buy books. Amazon takes away that freedom.

Officially, MPAA stands for Motion Picture Association of America, but I suggest that MPAA stands for Malicious Power Attacking All.

People sometimes ask me if it is a sin in the Church of Emacs to use vi. Using a free version of vi is not a sin; it is a penance. So happy hacking.

If ebooks mean that readers' freedom must either increase or decrease, we must demand the increase.

There is nothing wrong with wanting pay for work, or seeking to maximize one's income, as long as one does not use means that are destructive.

Whether gods exist or not, there is no way to get absolute certainty about ethics. Without absolute certainty, what do we do? We do the best we can.

Anything that prevents you from being friendly, a good neighbour, is a terror tactic.

Proprietary software tends to have malicious features. The point is with a proprietary program, when the users don't have the source code, we can never tell. So you must consider every proprietary program as potential malware.

Proprietary software is an injustice.

Value your freedom or you will lose it, teaches history. 'Don't bother us with politics', respond those who don't want to learn.